4,000-year-old handprint discovered on ancient Egyptian tomb offering

Researchers have unveiled an ancient Egypt­ian hand­print that was left on a soul house tomb offer­ing 4,000 years ago.

A photograph of the underside of the soul house on which an ancient Egyptian handprint is visible.

The hand­print is just about vis­i­ble towards the bot­tom of the soul house under­side (pic­tured here). (Image cred­it: © The Fitzwilliam Muse­um, Uni­ver­si­ty of Cam­bridge

Researchers have dis­cov­ered a 4,000-year-old hand­print on a tomb offer­ing from ancient Egypt, pro­vid­ing a rare glimpse into the life of its mak­er.

The hand­print was left on the under­side of a “soul house” — a mod­el dwelling that may have been intend­ed to serve as a rest­ing place for a dead per­son­’s soul. These mod­els, which were com­mon­ly found with buri­als, also held food offer­ings such as bread, let­tuce and ox heads, accord­ing to a state­ment from the Uni­ver­si­ty of Cam­bridge in the U.K.

The soul house dates to between 2055 and 1650 B.C. and came from a site called Deir Rifa, locat­ed around 174 miles (280 kilo­me­ters) north of the city of Lux­or in south­ern Egypt, The Art News­pa­perreport­ed. Researchers at the Fitzwilliam Muse­um, part of the Uni­ver­si­ty of Cam­bridge, dis­cov­ered the hand­print while prepar­ing for the muse­um’s upcom­ing Made in Ancient Egyptexhi­bi­tion.

Who­ev­er made the soul house like­ly left a hand­print behind by han­dling the clay before it had dried, the researchers said.

We’ve spot­ted traces of fin­ger­prints left in wet var­nish or on a cof­fin in the dec­o­ra­tion, but it is rare and excit­ing to find a com­plete hand­print under­neath this soul house,” Helen Strud­wick, the cura­tor of Made in Ancient Egypt and a senior Egyp­tol­o­gist at the Fitzwilliam Muse­um, said in the state­ment.

Relat­ed: Ancient Egypt­ian rock art dis­cov­ered near Aswan may be from the dawn of the first dynasty

Pot­ters cre­at­ed soul hous­es by build­ing a frame from wood­en sticks and coat­ing them with wet clay. The frame then burnt away when the pot­ters fired the clay at a high tem­per­a­ture to turn it into ceram­ic.

Researchers still have a lot to learn about soul hous­es. Eng­lish Egyp­tol­o­gist Sir William Matthew Flinders Petrie (1853 — 1942) coined the term and believed that the hous­es were used to pro­vide pro­vi­sions for the after­life, accord­ing to the Egypt at the Man­ches­ter Muse­umblog. How­ev­er, it’s uncer­tain whether they were intend­ed to act as hous­es for the spir­it of the deceased or sim­ply as sym­bol­ic offer­ings. The Uni­ver­si­ty of Cam­bridge state­ment not­ed that the hous­es may have served as both.

It’s unclear whether the soul hous­es rep­re­sent­ed the deceased’s house or a tomb. Strud­wick told The Art News­pa­per that soul hous­es were placed direct­ly over bur­ial shafts, sug­gest­ing that they were a cheap­er alter­na­tive to elab­o­rate tomb chapels that were built beside bur­ial cham­bers, and thus were used by peo­ple who could­n’t afford such lux­u­ries. How­ev­er, Strud­wick not­ed that she thinks there’s also a con­nec­tion between soul hous­es and the idea of the dead being able to return to their homes.

A photograph of the soul house from the front.

The soul house fea­tured rows of pil­lars across two lev­els, with a stair­case up to the sec­ond lev­el and the roof. (Image cred­it: © The Fitzwilliam Muse­um, Uni­ver­si­ty of Cam­bridge.”)

The soul house with a hand­print on its under­side has two lev­els with a row of pil­lars on each. Researchers sus­pect that the hand­print was left by some­one mov­ing the mod­el out of a work­shop to dry before fir­ing, accord­ing to the state­ment.

This hand­print is one of the rel­a­tive­ly few glimpses of pot­ters at work to have sur­vived from ancient Egypt.

I have nev­er seen such a com­plete hand­print on an Egypt­ian object before,” Strud­wick said. “You can just imag­ine the per­son who made this, pick­ing it up to move it out of the work­shop to dry before fir­ing. This takes you direct­ly to the moment when the object was made, and to the per­son who made it.”