Former Vice President Dick Cheney dead at 84

For­mer Vice Pres­i­dent Dick Cheney, con­sid­ered by many polit­i­cal observers to be the most polit­i­cal­ly active and influ­en­tial vice pres­i­dent in U.S. his­to­ry, has died. He was 84.

“Richard B. Cheney, the 46th Vice Pres­i­dent of the Unit­ed States, died last night, Novem­ber 3, 2025,” his fam­i­ly said in a state­ment. “He was 84 years old. His beloved wife of 61 years, Lynne, his daugh­ters, Liz and Mary, and oth­er fam­i­ly mem­bers were with him as he passed. The for­mer Vice Pres­i­dent died due to com­pli­ca­tions of pneu­mo­nia and car­diac and vas­cu­lar dis­ease.”

He worked for near­ly four decades in Wash­ing­ton. He served as the youngest White House chief of staff under Pres­i­dent Ger­ald Ford; rep­re­sent­ed Wyoming in the U.S. House of Rep­re­sen­ta­tives — where he worked with con­gres­sion­al lead­er­ship and Pres­i­dent Ronald Rea­gan; was sec­re­tary of defense under Pres­i­dent George H.W. Bush; and lat­er served two terms as vice pres­i­dent under Bush’s son, Pres­i­dent George W. Bush.

He was also CEO of Hal­libur­ton, an ener­gy com­pa­ny based in Texas that had a glob­al pres­ence.

When ter­ror­ists attacked the Unit­ed States on Sept. 11, 2001, it was Cheney who first took charge while the pres­i­dent was out of Wash­ing­ton.

“When the pres­i­dent came on the line, I told him that the Pen­ta­gon had been hit and urged him to stay away from Wash­ing­ton,” Cheney recalled in his mem­oir, “In My Time.” “The city was under attack, and the White House was a tar­get. I under­stood that he did­n’t want to appear to be on the run, but he should­n’t be here until we knew more about what was going on.”

He and senior staff gath­ered at the Pres­i­den­tial Emer­gency Oper­a­tions Cen­ter, where they mon­i­tored the hor­ror unfold­ing

“I stayed up into the morn­ing hours think­ing about what the attack meant and how we should respond,” Cheney wrote in his mem­oir. “We were in a new era and need­ed an entire­ly new strat­e­gy to keep Amer­i­ca secure. The first war of the twen­ty-first cen­tu­ry would­n’t sim­ply be a con­flict of nation against nation, army against army. It would be first and fore­most a war against ter­ror­ists who oper­at­ed in the shad­ows, feared no deter­rent, and would use any weapon they could get their hands on to destroy us.”

As vice pres­i­dent, Cheney was also known as the mas­ter­mind behind much of the Bush admin­is­tra­tion’s strat­e­gy in Iraq.

“His pow­er is unpar­al­leled in the his­to­ry of the repub­lic, frankly, for that posi­tion,” John Huls­man, a research fel­low at The Her­itage Foun­da­tion, a con­ser­v­a­tive Wash­ing­ton-based think tank, told ABC’s “Night­line” in 2005

Cheney said he looked upon his role as vice pres­i­dent as being an advis­er to the pres­i­dent

“I don’t run any­thing, I’m not in charge of a depart­ment or a par­tic­u­lar pol­i­cy area and for me to be out all of the time com­ment­ing on the issues of the day — pon­tif­i­cat­ing if you will — on what’s going on, to some extent infringes upon every­body else in the admin­is­tra­tion, espe­cial­ly with those spe­cif­ic peo­ple who have got spe­cif­ic respon­si­bil­i­ties,” he told ABC News Chief Glob­al Affairs Martha Rad­datz in an inter­view in March 2008, when she was a White House cor­re­spon­dent

“My val­ue to him is the fact that we can talk pri­vate­ly I can tell him what I think, some­times he agrees, some­times he dis­agrees he does­n’t take my advice all the time by any means,” he con­tin­ued. “But the con­tri­bu­tion that I make and my val­ue to him, I think, is greater because he knows and every­body else knows I’m not going to be in the front pages of the paper tomor­row talk­ing about what I advised the pres­i­dent on what par­tic­u­lar issue.”

Cheney was also a lead­ing defend­er of the Bush admin­is­tra­tion’s “War on Ter­ror” and unabashed­ly defend­ed the con­tro­ver­sial enhanced inter­ro­ga­tion tech­niques approved by the Bush admin­is­tra­tion against high-val­ue detainees. He and his daugh­ter Rep. Liz Cheney, who served as a Repub­li­can con­gress­woman from Wyoming until 2023, argued that those tech­niques, which includ­ed water­board­ing — an inter­ro­ga­tion tac­tic that sim­u­lates drown­ing — yield­ed valu­able infor­ma­tion from detainees. Water­board­ing was used on three prime ter­ror sus­pects held in Guan­tanamo Bay, CIA Direc­tor Michael Hay­den said in 2008.

“I was and remain a strong pro­po­nent of our enhanced inter­ro­ga­tion pro­gram,” Cheney said in May 2009, as he deliv­ered a duel­ing speech to Oba­ma’s remarks explain­ing why the pres­i­dent was end­ing the use of enhanced inter­ro­ga­tion tech­niques. “The inter­ro­ga­tions were used on hard­ened ter­ror­ists after oth­er efforts failed. They were legal, essen­tial, jus­ti­fied, suc­cess­ful and the right thing to do.”

And lat­er, in the 2013 doc­u­men­tary “The World Accord­ing to Dick Cheney,” the for­mer vice pres­i­dent said, “Tell me what ter­ror­ist attacks you would have let go for­ward because you did­n’t want to be a mean and nasty fel­low. Are you going to trade the lives of a num­ber of peo­ple because you want to pre­serve your hon­or, or are you going to do your job, do what’s required, first and fore­most your respon­si­bil­i­ty is to safe­guard the Unit­ed States of Amer­i­ca and the lives of its cit­i­zens.”

After his time in office end­ed, he remained polit­i­cal­ly active while for­mer Pres­i­dent George W. Bush had moved back to Texas and refrained from com­ment­ing on pol­i­tics in an effort to avoid “under­min­ing” the cur­rent pres­i­dent.

Dur­ing Pres­i­dent Barack Oba­ma’s admin­is­tra­tion, Cheney emerged as an out­spo­ken crit­ic of the pres­i­den­t’s nation­al secu­ri­ty poli­cies — charg­ing that Oba­ma’s coun­tert­er­ror­ism poli­cies were mak­ing the coun­try less safe.

It has always been easy for those who are evil to kill, but now it is pos­si­ble for a few to do so on an unimag­in­able scale,” Cheney wrote in his 2011 mem­oir

“The key, I think, is to choose seri­ous and vig­i­lant lead­ers, to lis­ten to the men and women who want us to entrust them with high office and judge whether they are say­ing what they think we want to hear or whether they have the larg­er cause of the coun­try in mind,” he con­tin­ued. “It’s not always easy to move beyond pleas­ing promis­es, but in the case of Amer­i­ca, the greater good is so grand.”